The authors regret: The first line under section 2.4 Calculation of coordination and coordination variability should read: • ‘The following equations are based on the step by step approach devised and reported by Needham et al. (2014)’. • Cite Chang et al. (2008) in addition to Sparrow et al. (1987) for equation, 4. Chang et al. (2008) already cited in paper. • Cite Batschelet (1981) in addition to Hamill et al., (2000). Batschelet, E., 1981. Circular Statistics in Biology. Academic Press, New York. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.</p
The original article contains an error in Fig. 3f whereby data is erroneously extrapolated beyond 80...
We provide a comment to our paper 'Humans falling in holes: adaptations in lower-limb joint mechanic...
The authors regret there was an error in the figures reported in the methodology flow chart for heal...
The authors regret: The first line under section 2.4 Calculation of coordination and coordination va...
The authors regret that affiliation b was incorrect in the published paper �Reliability of digital...
The authors regret an error and wish to make the following correction to their recently published pa...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The original abstract was pu...
The authors regret to inform that de-anonymisation of the study has failed in the publication. Secti...
and Methods section has been corrected to avoid misinterpretation. The sentence in question formerly...
The values reported for the star excursion balance test (SEBT) in Table 2 on page 47 are incorrect. ...
The authors regret that the Standard Deviation (SD) for those who failed their challenge (n = 19,693...
The authors regret to have included an incorrect panel of Fig. 1 to the manuscript. In Fig. 1, the b...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the American Physiologic...
The authors regret to have included an incorrect panel of Fig. 1 to the manuscript. In Fig. 1, the b...
The original article contains an error in Fig. 3f whereby data is erroneously extrapolated beyond 80...
We provide a comment to our paper 'Humans falling in holes: adaptations in lower-limb joint mechanic...
The authors regret there was an error in the figures reported in the methodology flow chart for heal...
The authors regret: The first line under section 2.4 Calculation of coordination and coordination va...
The authors regret that affiliation b was incorrect in the published paper �Reliability of digital...
The authors regret an error and wish to make the following correction to their recently published pa...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The original abstract was pu...
The authors regret to inform that de-anonymisation of the study has failed in the publication. Secti...
and Methods section has been corrected to avoid misinterpretation. The sentence in question formerly...
The values reported for the star excursion balance test (SEBT) in Table 2 on page 47 are incorrect. ...
The authors regret that the Standard Deviation (SD) for those who failed their challenge (n = 19,693...
The authors regret to have included an incorrect panel of Fig. 1 to the manuscript. In Fig. 1, the b...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the American Physiologic...
The authors regret to have included an incorrect panel of Fig. 1 to the manuscript. In Fig. 1, the b...
The original article contains an error in Fig. 3f whereby data is erroneously extrapolated beyond 80...
We provide a comment to our paper 'Humans falling in holes: adaptations in lower-limb joint mechanic...
The authors regret there was an error in the figures reported in the methodology flow chart for heal...